Subject: Re: Comparison, 8x8 data for U=8? / Re: last data set
From: <scalettar@physics.ucdavis.edu>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 15:30:29 -0700
To: Nils Bluemer <nbluemer@uni-mainz.de>
CC: "<scalettar@physics.ucdavis.edu> <scalettar@physics.ucdavis.edu>" <scalettar@physics.ucdavis.edu>, "Gorelik, Dr. Elena V." <gorelike@uni-mainz.de>, "trivedi@mps.ohio-state.edu" <trivedi@mps.ohio-state.edu>, Thereza Cristina de Lacerda Paiva <tclp@if.ufrj.br>


Dear Nils,

I'll re-run U=8.  I am not sure why the old PRL error bars are big.  Maybe
just differences in computer speeds now and then?  Thereza, do you remember?

I'll also try U=12 and U=15.

It certainly sounds nice to me to put DQMC together with DMFT carefully in
a joint paper.  Can I just wait and hear from collaborators before we
decide precisely how to proceed?

Please say 'Hi' to Karsten for me!